Sep 24

spontaneous toaster effect
No, I can’t prove that you won’t spontaneously turn into a toaster. But, in the case of some people, I can certainly wish you will. I’m often disappointed when I mingle within the art world and speak with fellow artists about anything other than art, specifically, science. All that tends to be said is a bunch of wishy-washy gobbly-goop. As a mangaka, I love telling stories, especially the kind of stories that involve magic, spirits, and strange sci-fi phenomena. However, that’s where it ends, for me. I don’t pretend to believe that any of the mysticism, either in my own work or in other books, manga, movies I love, can translate literally into the world we live in. There’s no reason to believe in the existence of spirits, ghosts, demons, deities…or…um, horcruxes. People don’t have psychic powers, they can’t perform divination, and no one can come back in blue-Jedi form (unfortunately). All that fun stuff can only happen within the imaginary made-up worlds in storytelling. But, when confronted with claims saying otherwise, what is a little, non-sciencey, mangaka to do? Eh? Whatcha gonna do, Ms. Grumpy-pants aka closed minded, cold, heartless, evidence-whore?!

The first problem to address is the misunderstanding over what science is. Like the cute-a-licious Michael Shermer says, science is a verb. Science isn’t old men in white lab coats; its critical thinking. If there’s one anti-science argument I hear over and over again it’s that science is biased. Well, gosh darn it, this breaks my little grumpy-pants heart! I think the mistake being made here is the difference between a scientist being biased and science being biased. “Of course, you’re gonna say my homeopathic quantum juice doesn’t work, Mr. Fancypants…you’re a ‘scientist’!” (And we all know that negative energy vibrations from Fancypants scientists interfere with how woo-juice works).

Jedi Master Sagan

Scientists can be prone to bias, like anyone else, but the scientific method itself is objective. There’s no better methodology one can use to fight against our own personal beliefs, observer bias, and confirmation bias. In the world of art and storytelling, things are based on interpretation and your work is perceived differently by different people because of their own experiences, cultural beliefs, and personal tastes. Two people can look at the same piece of art and hold two completely different and valid opinions about it. So, it makes sense that someone used to functioning in the art world might apply this type of thinking to science as well. However, science is not relative. One of the purposes of the scientific method is to produce results which can be repeated by anyone, anywhere, no matter what their biases may be. Again, I’m just a mangaka, but if I understand correctly, even with Einstein’s relativity-where observers can hold different but equally valid claims based on their frame of reference-the theory itself is not relative.

Perhaps, it would be better if I used the words critical thinking or rational thought instead of ‘science’. I doubt as many people would argue against being rational and I can’t think of many scenarios where one would stop and say “You know, I don’t think this is a claim that you should apply science critical thinking to”. If there’s one thing I’ve learned from being exposed to skepticism that I find most valuable is the ability to realize when I’m believing something simply because I want it to be true. Ann Druyan writes, in the introduction to Carl Sagan’s The Varieties of Scientific Experience:

“…science opens the way to levels of consciousness that are otherwise inaccessible to us; that, contrary to our cultural bias, the only gratification that science denies to us is deception.

Sep 17
wookie-press-conference

The story of two Gorgia men who claimed to have captured Bigfoot is a little old now, but I couldn’t keep the geekdom inside me any longer. Besides, such master pieces should not be kept from the world~! My original idea was not in comic form–I would love to see a wookie costume frozen in a block of ice in a fake press conference video posted on YouTube to spoof the Bigfoot hoax. But, I’m a mangaka so all I’m (barely) useful for is drawing silly pictures.

One of my favourite podcasts, SETI’s “Are We Alone”, had an episode about the hoax, Skeptical Sunday: Bigfoot Press Conference. What I like most is how the hosts, Seth Shostak and Molly Bentley, explain a lot about what good evidence is and why what was presented at the press conference is considered poor evidence. They also did an excellent job of pointing out how the man speaking to the press was setting up the story so that what would be presented might seem more credible.

Personally, I don’t think it’s absolutely absurd to think there might be a creature lurking in the forests of North America that we don’t know about. However, I think it’s most likely that there’s plenty of alternate explanations for these sort of sightings which are far more probable. I do have a beef with cryptozoology, though. This term for the study of hidden animals triggers my woo-alarm. I can’t see how one can investigate a claim, like a Sasquatch sighting, and be unbiased if they are calling themselves a cryptozoologist. You are naming yourself after your desired result: hidden animals. Don’t regular, plain-old, everyday zoologists find new species? I betcha they do…probably by coming across evidence that suggests there might be a new creature. But, since they aren’t exclusively in the search for undiscovered creatures, they should be less likely to overlook an alternate explanation for what they’ve found.

As for myself, I’m just a mangaka and part-time cryptoboyfriendologist.

Sep 13
mangaka-astronomer

If I could be in anything else, besides a mangaka, and had a magic wand that could make me a professional in any other field, then I would choose to be an astronomer. I think, most likely, I’d like to be a planetary scientist. I bought a telescope a couple years ago and love going out in the backyard for some stargazing. The first planet I saw was Jupiter, on a really clear summer evening. The small town I live in doesn’t have much light pollution, which is nice. It amazed me that this little instrument could turn what was otherwise just a really bright ’star’ in the sky into a glowing planet with tiny specks of moons around it. Then there’s Saturn…homg, RINGS~! Ha ha, it’s them Jovian planets that impress the ladies (or at least, this lady).

I did this little doodle a few months ago. I have since chopped off my hair. It was really cloudy and rainy here this summer, so I didn’t get to use my telescope much. My family doesn’t really seem interested in what I look at in the sky, so I mostly get excited all by me onesies, ha! Perhaps, I’m easily amused, but looking through an eyepiece at this dot in the sky and seeing a real planet really geeks me up inside and it blows my mind that it’s so big and so far away–LIKE, WOW~a whole other planet!

This past week, I spent some time in North Bay, about a 2.5 hour drive south of where I live. Usually, nerdtasticly cool people to hang out with have to be imported here, to Kirkland, for me to get the chance to chat non-digitally. But this time, I made the journey down from the k-hole and enjoy latenight caffeine beverage loitering in the Bay. If you mention the LHC around my family you either get a response of “…..?” or “Um, like, that’s totally gonna make a black hole thingy and destroy the Earth, like, omg“–so it’s nice to get away from their adorable hicksvilleness.

On the drive back up to the ‘Shire’ (this only refers to the small part of Kirkland that I’ve hobbitised with second breakfast and no adventures), I listened to the Astronomy Cast podcast. It was the first time I’d heard the show, and this particular episode was done live from Dragon Con and the discussion was from a panel that dealt with scientific facts and/or mistakes in science fiction–from Trek, Battlestar Gallactica, to Dr. Who. I really enjoyed it so I’m checking out more of their episodes!

Sep 10
First Entry
icon1 Sara E.M. | icon2 Journal Entries | icon4 09 10th, 2008| icon31 Comment »
first-entry

Welcome to my new blog!

I wasn’t sure I needed another place on the web to ramble; there’s the Secrets of Sorcerers news blog, as well as the update blog found on the main SaraMayhew.com site, and blog spaces on myspace, facebook, and my new deviantart account. However, I decided I wanted a space where I could write about a wide range of topics that interest me and in a setting that won’t mix with my work. I’d like to keep the blog spaces on my work related sites relevant to news and updates about my manga series and professional work.

Hopefully, this space can serve as a place to write about my interests–anything from astronomy and other sciences, to the wide range of geekstuff I enjoy. I’d like to combine my little manga doodles and have a sort of sketch blog here. I’m sure there’s plenty of anime fans and manga readers out there that also enjoy sci-fi shows like Star Wars, Trek, and other geeky stuff…but, I’d like to also bring in my interest in science and critical thinking. My experience has been that the stereotype for creative artsy types is that they tend to believe in new age, metaphysical mumbo-jumbo. This is my little place on the web to show that I’m a skeptical anti-pseudoscience mangaka.